USPTO serial 74709219
SALEM AVALANCHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2003
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SALEM AVALANCHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salem Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
Salem, VA
Other trademarks owned by Salem Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
Salem Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
Salem, VA
Other trademarks owned by Salem Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
Salem Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
Salem, VA
Other trademarks owned by Salem Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Krafte
LORI KRAFTE FROST BROWN TODD LLC2200 PNC CTR201 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | housewares and glass; namely, coffee cups, beverage glassware and beverageware, all goods relating to or promoting professional baseball | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Salem Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Salem Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Salem Professional Baseball Club, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SALEM AVALANCHE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 7, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |