USPTO serial 74709424
BANANAS ULTIMATE JUICE BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BANANAS ULTIMATE JUICE BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stuart Kudman
STUART KUDMAN KUDMAN, TRACHTEN & KESSLER350 FIFTH AVESTE 1423NEW YORK, NY 10118-1487Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail juice bar service- namely providing fruit beverage drinks and related fruit and beverage drink and food items | ABANDONED | Jan 10, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1998 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |