USPTO serial 74709450
AUTOSPIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUTOSPIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DEERFIELD, IL
DEERFIELD, IL
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Wilmington, DE
Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOIS K WINSTON
LOIS K WINSTON DADE INTERNATIONAL INC1717 DEERFIELD RDDEERFIELD, IL 60015-0778UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | centrifuges, including rotors, gyros and accessories for separating blood products and other body fluids for clinical laboratory use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DADE INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DADE INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
- Other trademarks owned by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named AUTOSPIN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 1999 | EX2M | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | EX2D | SOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 29, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |