Drawing for COLORADO AVALANCHE

USPTO serial 74709496

COLORADO AVALANCHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLORADO AVALANCHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARY J. SOTIS

MARY J SOTIS NHL ENTERPRISES, LP1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020-1198UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, shirts, jackets, swearshirts, T-shirts, pants, sweatpants, warm-up suits, wristbands, headbands, shorts, caps, hats, socks, mittens and cloth bibsACTIVEAug 15, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 24, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 24, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 16, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 27, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 28, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 16, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 15, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 23, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 18, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 29, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 13, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance