USPTO serial 74709542
OCTELNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OCTELNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST 16TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for use in electronic voice mail and voice messaging, electronic mail, automated attendant, interactive voice response, namely, recording, storage and subsequent retransmission of voice and data messages based on user input, call processing, word processing, fax processing, namely, electronic transmission of messages and data, computer information storage and retreival, database processing, accessing computer databases, networking, and programming tools and utilities; and instructional manuals distributed therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic voice mail and voice messaging services and interactive voice response services, namely, recording, storage and subsequent retransmission of voice and data messages by telephone or computer network based on user input; electronic mail services; fax processing services, namely, electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic automated attendant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by OCTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named OCTELNET
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |