USPTO serial 74709716
GENERAL STORE AT SUNDANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2002
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GENERAL STORE AT SUNDANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN ZAFMAN
NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair conditioner, bubble bath, bath and hand soaps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sundance Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sundance Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sundance Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named GENERAL STORE AT SUNDANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |