USPTO serial 74709931
CDMALINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CDMALINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | communications computers; computer software for the operation of telecommunications systems; telecommunications and telephone equipment, namely, telephones, telephone handsets, videophones, telephone switches, telephone answering sets, automatic telephone dialing apparatus, private automatic branch exchanges, facsimile machines, photocopiers, and power supply units for telecommunications networks and equipment; transmission media, namely, telecommunication cables and optical fibers; and parts thereof | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |