USPTO serial 74710101
OMNI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, ERNESTO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMNI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pepepr Pike, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Jaffe
MICHAEL JAFFE D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPATHE BAKER BLDG1940 E 6TH ST SIXTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | solvents, namely, acetone, aromatics, hexane, methanol, methylene, mineral spirtis, toluene, napthas, xylene, isopropyl alcohol (IPA), methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), lacquer diluent, perchloroethylene (PERC), trichloroethane (111TRI), trichloroethylene (TRI), chlorinated solvents, and solvent blends thereof | ABANDONED | Jan 2, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 11, 1999 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jan 7, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |