USPTO serial 74710143
FITNESS FLASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FITNESS FLASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virginia Beach, VA
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAPHNE GRONICH
DAPHNE GRONICH FOX GRPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTP O BOX 900BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90213Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications, namely, newsletters in the field of health and fitness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cable Health TV, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FIT TV PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by FIT TV PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named FITNESS FLASH
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |