USPTO serial 74710178
INFUNITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFUNITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Lee, Jr.
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE, MANN, SMITH, MCWILLIAMS, ET ALSTE 410208TH S LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60604-1202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's, women's, and children's clothing, namely dresses, skirts, blouses, shirts, teeshirts, tops, sweaters, suits, blazers, sweatshirts, sweatsuits, tank tops, pants, slacks, jeans, shorts, jumpers, jackets, coats, raincoats, bathing suits, ski jackets, ski pants, mittens, gloves, underwear, pantyhose, crinolines, belts, scarves, hats, caps, lingerie, pajamas, nightgowns, nightshirts, shoes, running shoes, boots, slippers and sandals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |