USPTO serial 74711013
KAZAAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAZAAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANNE B NELSON
ANNE B NELSON INTERSCOPE COMMUNICATIONS INC100 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | toys and games, namely, action figures, plush toys, stuffed toys, dolls, banks, balloons, toy vehicles, remote-control toys, 3-D viewers, kites, electronic games, and coin operated pinball machines, hand-held units for playing electronic games, dart boards, board games, play sets with figures, playing cards, wind-up toys, water guns, puzzles, flying discs; sporting goods, namely, basketballs and backboards, roller skates, skateboards, footballs, baseballs, balls, body boards, sporting gloves, namely, baseball batting gloves, baseball gloves; bicycling gloves, boxing gloves, goalkeepers' gloves, handball gloves, hockey gloves, karate gloves, ski gloves, softball gloves, swimming gloves and waterski gloves, paddles; computer game programs; computer game joysticks; computer game cartridges; computer game cassettes; computer game discs; computer game tapes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |