USPTO serial 74711316
VALUE DYNAMICS SIMULATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VALUE DYNAMICS SIMULATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Dennis Claessens
R DENNIS CLAESSENS HILL, STEADMAN & SIMPSON85TH FL - SEARS TWRCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | auditing; business consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., SOCIETE COOPERATIVE
- Other trademarks owned by ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO., SOCIETE COOPERATIVE
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named VALUE DYNAMICS SIMULATION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |