USPTO serial 74711416
SUNBEE AIROSOL PRODUCTS AIRSTREAM=AIRFLOW=AIRSPRAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNBEE AIROSOL PRODUCTS AIRSTREAM=AIRFLOW=AIRSPRAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GRIFFITHS, SOLVIE ANDLAUG SUNDBY
Ferndown, Dorset, BH22 8LT, GB
GRIFFITHS, SOLVIE ANDLAUG SUNDBY
Ferndown, Dorset, BH22 8LT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M. GOLDBERG
RICHARD M GOLDBERG25 E SALEM STHACKENSACK, NJ 07601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | edible oils; flavored cooking oils; vegetable oils; vegetable oil sprays for use in cooking; oil-based cooking products, namely, shortenings; preparations consisting primarily of egg and oil and also including sugar and vinegar for use in sauces and/or salad dressings; cooking oils, namely, olive oil, sunflower oil, grape seed oil, ground nut oil, sesame seed oil, maize oil, palm oil, rape oil, soya bean oil, corn oil, safflower oil, nut oil, coconut oil, and almond oil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRIFFITHS, SOLVIE ANDLAUG SUNDBY
- Other trademarks owned by GRIFFITHS, SOLVIE ANDLAUG SUNDBY
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named SUNBEE AIROSOL PRODUCTS AIRSTREAM=AIRFLOW=AIRSPRAY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |