USPTO serial 74711865
MOTHER'S HELPER KRUNCHKIES KRISPY MARSHMALLOW SNAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOTHER'S HELPER KRUNCHKIES KRISPY MARSHMALLOW SNAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IRWIN C ALTER
IRWIN C ALTER ALTER & WEISS105 W ADAMS STSTE 2700CHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | marshmallow and crispy processed or rolled oats snack food | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 20, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |