USPTO serial 74712097
OCEAN KAYAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLINGTON, THOMAS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OCEAN KAYAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R. Schacht
MICHAEL R SCHACHT HUGHES, MULTER & SCHACHT, PS1720 IOWA STBELLINGHAM, WA 98226UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | human propelled and small non-motorized watercraft, namely kayaks and canoes; accessories and parts for kayaks and canoes, namely kayak and canoe paddles, kayak knee braces to be strapped within kayak and canoe cockpits to facilitate control of kayaks and canoes, straps for kayak knee braces, carrying bags for kayaks, backrests to be mounted within kayak and canoe cockpits, paddle leashes for attaching kayak and canoe paddles to kayaks and canoes; kayak skates on which kayaks and canoes are mounted for transportation on land | ABANDONED | Mar 17, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |