USPTO serial 74712921
TELEWEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELEWEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Superior Broadcasting Corporation
Bedford, TX
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
Superior Broadcasting Corporation
Bedford, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS L. HENDRICKS
DOUGLAS L HENDRICKS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing information in a wide variety of fields by means of a global computer information network, and computer site design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Superior Broadcasting Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by KDDI AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KDD AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Superior Broadcasting Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TELEWEB
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |