USPTO serial 74714736
MICROUNITY MICROUNITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROUNITY MICROUNITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONNA M. TANGUAY
DONNA M TANGUAY MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY1850 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | integrated communications and video products comprising hardware platforms, operating systems and communications interfaces for processing voice, video and data signals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | designing and programming for others communications platforms and subsystems for use in processing voice, video and data signals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Microunity Systems Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Microunity Systems Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MICROUNITY MICROUNITY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, INC.
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 30, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |