USPTO serial 74714901
RINGLING ONLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2000
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with RINGLING ONLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.
Vienna, VA
Other trademarks owned by Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.
Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.
Vienna, VA
Other trademarks owned by Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.
Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.
Vienna, VA
Other trademarks owned by Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily Poole
Emily Poole Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | electronic on-line retailing in the field of merchandise related to a specific circus | ACTIVE | Sep 27, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named RINGLING ONLINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 3, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 3, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |