Drawing for SUPERCHARGE II

USPTO serial 74715033

SUPERCHARGE II

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERCHARGE II?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Kurtz

JAMES L KURTZ FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNEYSTE 900135 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical gasoline and motor oil additivesABANDONEDMay 14, 1973

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1998ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 11, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 4, 1998EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 6, 1998EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 29, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 29, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 5, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance