USPTO serial 74715228
UPSIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UPSIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Brian Pingel
G BRIAN PINGEL3737 WOODLAND AVE STE 437WEST DES MOINES, IA 50266UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | electronic brokerage services, namely providing computer instructional services for the electronic processing of stock brokerage transactions via a global computer information network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 19, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |