USPTO serial 74715937
TRINITY TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENDERSON, CINDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRINITY TECHNOLOGIES CORP.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen R. McCarthy
KAREN R MCCARTHY DOSTER, ROBINSON & JAMES, PC16476 CHESTERFIELD AIRPORT RDSTE 210CHESTERFIELD, MI 63017-2044Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | manufacture of pharmaceuticals to the order and/or specification of proprietary formulations or the specifications of others | ABANDONED | May 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |