USPTO serial 74715944
C.P.O.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C.P.O.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IRA T KASDAN
IRA T KASDAN GALLAND KHARASCH & GARFINKLE PC1054 31ST ST NW STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | orthotic services, namely, evaluating, designing, fabricating, fitting, and aligning braces known as 'orthoses' for patients with congenital and/or traumatic disabling conditions of the musculo-skeletal structure and prosthetic services, namely, evaluating, designing, fabricating, fitting, and aligning artificial limbs on or for patients with partial or total absence of a limb | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1949 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 13, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |