Drawing for Serial No. 74716136

USPTO serial 74716136

Serial No. 74716136

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74716136?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MAVIS S. GALLENSON

MAVIS S GALLENSON LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD21ST FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005nutritional supplementsACTIVE—
030herbal food beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 13, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 2, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2005EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Apr 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 30, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 1, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 2, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 2, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance