USPTO serial 74716137
SERVER/CLIENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SERVER/CLIENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Scott
THOMAS J SCOTT MS C1SW19UNISYS CORPORATIONP O BOX 500BLUE BELL, PA 19424Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | installation of computer software, namely, a series of object-oriented software development tools used to build programs, run and manage networks | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | computer software consultation and computer programming for others of a series of object-oriented software development tools used to build programs, run and manage networks | ABANDONED | Apr 24, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |