Drawing for SERVER/CLIENT

USPTO serial 74716137

SERVER/CLIENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERVER/CLIENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Scott

THOMAS J SCOTT MS C1SW19UNISYS CORPORATIONP O BOX 500BLUE BELL, PA 19424

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037installation of computer software, namely, a series of object-oriented software development tools used to build programs, run and manage networksABANDONED—
042computer software consultation and computer programming for others of a series of object-oriented software development tools used to build programs, run and manage networksABANDONEDApr 24, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 6, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 1998ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 1998EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 24, 1997CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 17, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 12, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance