USPTO serial 74716323
ROLLY RHINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROLLY RHINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Barrington, IL
North Barrington, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas J. Valenziano, Jr.
NICHOLAS J VALENZIANO JR WILLIAN BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE PCP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | publications, namely books, certificates and pamphlets devoted to motivating and encouraging children to read | ACTIVE | May 29, 1998 |
| 028 | toys, namely, stuffed animals, dolls, games, namely, action games, board games, and card games, kites, puppets and stamps devoted to motivating and encouraging children to read | ACTIVE | May 29, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 8, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |