USPTO serial 74716363
SMASH BOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMASH BOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Culver City, CA
Culver City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN ZAFMAN
NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, headwear and footwear, namely, T-shirts, shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, sweaters, vests, jackets, coats, shorts, pants, sweatpants, swimwear, undershirts, underpants, gloves, hosiery and socks, hats, caps and visors, belts for clothing, and footwear, namely, casual shoes, dress shoes, athletic footwear, beach footwear and sandals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 8, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |