USPTO serial 74716396
RAPESCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAPESCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kent TN14 5DF, GB
Kent TN14 5DF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Moore
THOMAS J MOORE BACON & THOMAS625 SLATERS LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | tacker staples for commercial use and parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | machine presses, namely, stapling press machines; power operated staplers | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | pliers, namely, stapling pliers | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | staple removers; staples; paper clips; clips for paper articles, namely, letter clips, filing clips and fold-back clips; pencil sharpeners; paper hole punches; writing paper, namely, stationery; pens; pencils; markers; adhesive tape for stationery or household use; blank and partially printed labels; paper, namely, writing, copy, bond and printing paper; cardboard, cardboard boxes, cardboard cartons and containers; files, namely, paper expanding files, card files, document files and letter files; binders; folders; clip boards; document holders; adhesive tape dispensers for household or stationery use; portfolios, namely, stationery-type portfolios; card files; desk blotters; cardboard floor display units for merchandising products; paper sign holders used to hold menus; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; paper staplers; office staplers; business card holders and card holders made of plastic for office use; paper cutters; office perforating machines; tape printers for office use; tacker staples for office use; display books for office use, namely, books containing transparent pockets for the display of printed matter; tape dispensers for office use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RAPESCO GROUP PLC
- Other trademarks owned by RAPESCO GROUP PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named RAPESCO
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |