USPTO serial 74716483
MAGIC EL ENCUENTRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAGIC EL ENCUENTRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys and playthings, Namely, Action figures, plush dolls, puppets, manipulative puzzles, non-electronic hand-held skill games, kites, yo-yos, toy ballons, decorative windsocks, toy banks, jigsaw puzzles, model cars for childern, and musical toy instruments | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |