Drawing for PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 74717006

PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LE, MARGARET
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chetuan L. Shaffer

CHETUAN L SHAFFER SBC COMMUNICATIONS INC175 E HOUSTON RM 1212SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009television remote controls; wireless transmission and receiving devices, namely, cellular pagers, personal communication handsets, personal digital assistants, antennas, satellite dishes; televisions; televison peripheral accessories, namely, set top boxes, rooftop antennas; electrical and rotating memory devices, namely, video servers; blank videocassettes, laser disks, CD ROMs; laser disk players; CD ROM players; videocassette players; computers, computer monitors, computer terminals, computer peripherals, disc drives, computer programs for use in accessing, displaying, searching, manipulating, storing, and retrieving electronic data and instructional manuals sold as a unit; computer furniture; interactive communications devices, namely, transmitters, receivers; telecommunications equipment, communications and transmission media, namely, coaxial cable, fiber optic cableABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 1998ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 26, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 7, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 17, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 21, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 19, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance