Drawing for POST.OFFICE

USPTO serial 74717094

POST.OFFICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BILLINGS, JESSIE W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with POST.OFFICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew P. Bridges

ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI, PC650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, namely, a message transport agent for directing e-mail across a global computer information network, based on the open standards and incorporated high security and ease of useABANDONEDFeb 6, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 23, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 23, 2002OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 23, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 14, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 1, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 15, 1996UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance