USPTO serial 74717129
INTEGRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2084630Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 1997
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Lindsey
JOHN C LINDSEY DANIELS & DANIELS, PA1000 PARK FORTY PLZ STE 280DURHAM, NC 27713UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | arranging, organizing and managing for others the origination, scheduling and delivery of corn and other grains, namely, the locating and arranging for the scheduling and delivery of corn and other grains for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 1995 |
| 042 | field evaluation and testing of corn and other grains for others, analyzing the nutritional and anti-nutritional components of corn and other grains for others, quality control of corn and other grains from others, and agronomy consulting services for others relating to the production of corn and other grains | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision Foods Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision Foods Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Precision Foods Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTEGRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 19, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |