USPTO serial 74717136
MELINDA FIRST LADY OF MAGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MELINDA FIRST LADY OF MAGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY D CONWAY
JEFFREY D CONWAY SKLAR WARREN & CONWAY LLP221 N BUFFALO DR STE ALAS VEGAS, NV 89128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | hobby/craft kits comprising magic tricks, stuffed animals, toys, namely, miniature bats and toy baseball helmets, dolls and doll accessories therefor, boxing gloves, childrens' play tents, bathtub toys, stuffed toy figures and toy animals, golf ball markers and divot repair tools for golfers, soft toys and playthings in the nature of dolls, jack-in-the-boxes, toy banks, baseball bats and balls, inflatable bats and balls, checker sets, toy cars and trucks, inflatable pools, tennis racquets, golf clubs, whistlers comprising a toy consisting of a grooved disc attached to one end of a spring upon which it can be made to spin up and down and flying discs, toy tractors, toy pick-ups, balloons, coin-operated video machines, Christmas tree ornaments, puppets, plastic and rubber toy balls, snow globes, jigsaw puzzles, dart-type games, toy bakeware, toy banks, beanbags, toy railroad cars, toy soda dispensers, video output game machines, toy vehicles and hobbycraft kits for making vehicles, jump ropes, hand puppets, and toy building structures | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |