USPTO serial 74718569
MEDIBASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIBASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Pandiscio
MARK J PANDISCIO PANDISCIO & PANDISCIO470 TOTTEN POND RDWALTHAM, MA 02154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical data acquisition unit for acquiring patient-specific medical history information directly from a patient, comprising specialized computer hardware and software adapted to interactively query a patient on an individualized basis regarding that patient's specific medical history, and to record that patient's specific medical history information for later access during patient treatment | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |