USPTO serial 74718747
DELMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 1998
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DELMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
Usines Dielectriques Et Du Fil Isole Moderne
90100 Delle, FR
Other trademarks owned by Usines Dielectriques Et Du Fil Isole Moderne
90100 - DELLE, FR
90100 - DELLE, FR
Usines Dielectriques Et Du Fil Isole Moderne
90100 Delle, FR
Other trademarks owned by Usines Dielectriques Et Du Fil Isole Moderne
Usines Dielectriques Et Du Fil Isole Moderne
90100 Delle, FR
Other trademarks owned by Usines Dielectriques Et Du Fil Isole Moderne
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 Third Avenue, 10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | electrical insulating materials, namely, polyester and glass laminated papers and fabrics used in the manufacture of generators, motors, traction units, transformers, fire resistant cables, and printed circuit boards for use in the electrical, mechanical engineering, chemical and automotive industries and for oil and oceanographic exploration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Usines Dielectriques Et Du Fil Isole Moderne
- Other trademarks owned by ISOLA COMPOSITES FRANCE
- Other trademarks owned by VON ROLL ISOLA FRANCE
- Other trademarks owned by Usines Dielectriques Et Du Fil Isole Moderne
- Other trademarks owned by Usines Dielectriques Et Du Fil Isole Moderne
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named DELMAT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 24, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |