USPTO serial 74719178
IDAHO GARNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 20, 1998
- Examiner
- LOOK, JEFFREY J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IDAHO GARNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Manny D. Pokotilow
MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR RIVISE BERNSTEIN COHEN ET ALSEVEN PENN CTR1635 MARKET ST 12TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry containing garnets from Idaho | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 24, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 1996 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |