USPTO serial 74719260
SUNWISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUNWISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SAMUEL D LITTLEPAGE
SAMUEL D LITTLEPAGE DICKINSON WRIGHT MOON VAN DUSEN ET AL1901 L ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed materials, namely decals, greeting cards, posters, and newsletters featuring sun awareness safety topics | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely shirts, pants, sweaters, swimsuits, jackets, hats and caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting seminars and conferences in the field of sun awareness safety and distributing course materials in connection therewith, and development and dissemination of educational materials of others in the field of sun awareness | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ponder, Daniel F.
- Other trademarks owned by Ponder, Daniel F.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SUNWISE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 14, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |