USPTO serial 74719352
SMART POLYMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART POLYMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT E KREBS
ROBERT E KREBS BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS LLPP O BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-3187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | polymers having expansion and contraction properties in response to various environmental conditions for further manufacture by others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 27, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |