USPTO serial 74719660
BEAUTY BRANDS SALON SPA SUPERSTORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2174042Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 1998
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEAUTY BRANDS SALON SPA SUPERSTORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl L. Burbach
Cheryl L. Burbach Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | retail store services in the field of magazines, books, cosmetics, fragrances, skin care preparations, hair care preparations, soaps, nail care products, candles, sunglasses, massage oils, essential oils, bath and shower oil and gels, deodorants, baskets, pantyhose, personal care and grooming items, travel cases, hair accessories, diffusers, blow dryers, cleanining preparations, aroma therapies, jewelry and fashion accessories, atomizers, spray bottles, spa accessories, gift novelties, and beauty salon services featuring hair care, hair styling, skin care, facials, body wraps, nail treatments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 9, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 1, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |