USPTO serial 74719704
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FREEDOM OF SPEECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Little Chute, WI
Little Chute, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. McConnell
ANDREW S MCCONNELL ANDRUS, SCEALES, STARKE & SAWALL100 E WISCONSIN AVE STE 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, telephone service, electronic storage and forwarding of messages; WATS telephone service, SDN telephone services for transmission of voice or messages, telephone services for transmission of voice or data, electronic voice messaging, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals, facsimile transmission services, mobile radio communication for the location of vehicles or personnel, and for emergency use, telephone services for transmission of voice and data for medical purposes, video conferencing services, video-on-demand transmission services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |