USPTO serial 74720259
LITTLE HAVANA CAFE FRUTAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LITTLE HAVANA CAFE FRUTAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BERNARD MALINA
BERNARD MALINA MALINA & WOLSON60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | face, hand, and body soaps; perfume; toilet waters; cologne; talcum powder; face, hand, and body lotions; cream body lotions; liquid body soaps; face, hand, and body bar soap; scented plashes; eau-de-toilette; and dusting powder | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |