Drawing for BLENDING OF SCIENCE & NATURE

USPTO serial 74721217

BLENDING OF SCIENCE & NATURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLENDING OF SCIENCE & NATURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent E. Baldauf

KENT E BALDAUF700 KOPPERS BLDG436 SEVENTH AVEPITTSBURGH, PA 15219-1818

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pain relief medication, namely a topical gelABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 1998ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance