USPTO serial 74721258
OPTIMUM STYLING TOOLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHY, MICHELLE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPTIMUM STYLING TOOLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Gumina
JAMES C GUMINA MCDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERFHOFF300 S WACKER DR 32ND FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric hot air curling products, namely, curling irons and curling brushes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1998 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 1998 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |