USPTO serial 74721643
ZERO TO THREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZERO TO THREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Kaden
JEFFREY M KADEN GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN, PC270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bag Bazaar Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Bag Bazaar Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named ZERO TO THREE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 18, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |