USPTO serial 74721684
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELECTRONIC COMMERCE PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY BARTON CAHN
JEFFREY BARTON CAHN SILLS CUMMIS ZUCKERMAN RADIN, ET ALONE RIVERFRONT PLZNEWARK, NJ 07102-5400UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software programs for operation of a system for ordering goods electronically through computer modem | ACTIVE | Jul 25, 1995 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing expedited computerized on-line retail and ordering services for others to enable third-party retailers to market their goods and services in fields of hard goods such as auto parts medical supplies, heavy machinery, tools, equipment truck parts and other discrete items with parts numbers and not soft goods | ACTIVE | Jul 25, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 7, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |