USPTO serial 74721930
TOMMY BAHAMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOMMY BAHAMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM S STERNS III
WILLIAM S STERNS III WALTER CONSTON ALEXANDER & GREEN PC90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1387UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named TOMMY BAHAMA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |