Drawing for CAFE AMSTERDAM

USPTO serial 74722331

CAFE AMSTERDAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVY, MICHAEL S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAFE AMSTERDAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. John Campaign

H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY, PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant and bar servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 1999ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 27, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 27, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 27, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 9, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 5, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 9, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 15, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 11, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 4, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance