Drawing for VOIS PLUS

USPTO serial 74722354

VOIS PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOIS PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Lasky

MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009telephones; computer telephone headsets, telephone headsets, cordless telephone headsets, telephone headset amplifiers, and parts thereforeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance