USPTO serial 74722874
AMERICAN HOME FASHIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3014294Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 15, 2005
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMERICAN HOME FASHIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OMAHA, NE
Dalton, GA
OMAHA, NE
DALTON, GA
DALTON, GA
Omaha, NE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melissa J. Lee
MELISSA J LEE NEAL & MCDEVITT LLC1776 ASH STNORTHFIELD, IL 60093UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | carpeting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COLUMBIA INSURANCE COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Queen Carpet Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by COLUMBIA INSURANCE COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SHAW INDUSTRIES GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SHAW INDUSTRIES, INC
- Other trademarks owned by COLUMBIA INSURANCE COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named AMERICAN HOME FASHIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2016 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2016 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |