USPTO serial 74724042
LCI.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LCI.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nelson Blitz
NELSON BLITZ ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, PC9302 LEE HWY STE 1100FAIRFAX, VA 22031UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | dissemination of advertising matter | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, electronic transmission of voice, data, documents, multimedia, graphics, videos, photos, audio and information and providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LCI INTERNATIONAL TELECOM CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by LCI INTERNATIONAL TELECOM CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named LCI.NET
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |