USPTO serial 74724136
SONOMA GRILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SONOMA GRILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Flood
SCOTT W FLOOD FLOOD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION95 BRIDGE STMANCHESTER, NH 04101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | full line of seasoned coatings for meat, fish, poultry, fruit and vegetables, full line of marinade mixes, full line of dry sauce mixes, full line of barbecue sauce mixes, full line of additives for non-nutritional purposes for uses as flavoring, as an ingredient or as a filler in or on food, full line of additives for non-nutritional purposes for uses as a dry mix type flavoring, full line of seasonings for uses as dry pre-packaged mixes, full line of dry mixes for use either with or without added liquid, as grill seasoned grill mix, marinate mix, sauce mix and seasoning mix | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1997 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |